A blogger writes
Date: June 7, 2017 Author: fromthemurkydepths
Temporary rail cuts due to London Bridge rebuild now permanent from 2018?
It looks like bad news for Southeastern passengers as recent
“temporary” service cuts and slower journeys introduced due to the
London Bridge rebuild could be made permanent after completion of the
work in 2018. Over the past couple of years I’ve covered the London
Bridge rebuild program which has caused much upheaval for Southeastern passengers across south east London.
I’ve reported on cuts between London terminals and Deptford, Greenwich, Maze Hill and Westcombe Park, which were particularly severe in the evening peak.
In August 2016 these changes occurred:
I didn’t criticise the “temporary” changes given major work being carried out and the fact it was not supposed to last beyond completion of the project, though I did question mitigation. Cutting train lengths alongside was not smart. Southeastern had to change things within weeks as they misjudged passenger numbers.
Anyway, fast forward and those “temporary” cuts in capacity and frequency introduced in August 2016 look set to remain after the multi-billion pound scheme completes in 2018.
Click here to see Southeastern’s planned timetable from January 2018. That is when trains from Cannon Street will once again be able to stop at London Bridge. I expected services to at least revert to how they were before 2016. But there’s still only around eight trains leaving London terminals shown in the future timetable. And not only that, the padding added in to the timetable over this period has been retained. More massaging of stats. Cannon Street to Abbey Wood is two minutes slower.
In reality, I hoped for a slight improvement in journey times given more tracks and platforms were being built which should have reduced congestion.
Increasing the number of tracks and platforms at London Bridge from six to nine was supposed to improve things for Southeastern passengers. It was a major selling point. It was to mean less congestion on approach or departure from London Bridge as Thameslink trains wouldn’t cross Southeastern trains as services would mostly be segregated enabling quicker journeys.
Charing Cross services
More tracks and platforms for Charing Cross services was supposed to do likewise. No evidence of this at all.
It’s hard on my cursory look through to see many who use Southeastern that actually benefits from the scheme. Have a look and maybe I’m wrong.
Fast trains that run up to 2016 also seemed to have disappeared. They’ve cut trains and made the few remaining services stop at every stop. Particularly bad news for those going to Dartford and beyond.
The whole scheme seems to benefit Thameslink passengers in south and north London, which was expected, but offer little to Southeastern users.
The Greenwich line may receive two Thameslink trains an hour but that will be a whole year afterwards. And even then some Southeastern stations may see cuts alongside.
So another year with poor service for these busy stations? Even adding Thameslink brings a net drop on service levels before the scheme commenced. And in areas with masses of housebuilding underway. I’ve covered many new developments around Deptford station.
Maybe planners think Crossrail coming to Abbey Wood and Woolwich means cuts further along the line are fine. Again though, Crossrail opens a whole year after. And peak gaps of near 25 minutes just aren’t acceptable at very busy stations such as Greenwich. It appears to be getting the worst service in decades after the completion of a scheme that was sold as bringing many improvements.Was this always the plan yet kept quiet? Has this come about due to Chris Grayling becoming Transport Secretary and George Osborne cutting the transport budget massively at the 2015 spending review? Many Tory voters are on sticky ground after this if commenting on poor rail services. It adds to a catalogue of improvements now probably shelved due to Tory action such as:
I’ve reported on cuts between London terminals and Deptford, Greenwich, Maze Hill and Westcombe Park, which were particularly severe in the evening peak.
In August 2016 these changes occurred:
- During the period from 17:00-19:00 service levels of 13 trains from London Cannon Street to Greenwich reduced to 8 trains. A 38% cut.
- Cuts for Deptford, Maze Hill and Westcombe Park stations saw 11 trains down to 8 (a 27% reduction) from 17:00-19:00.
I didn’t criticise the “temporary” changes given major work being carried out and the fact it was not supposed to last beyond completion of the project, though I did question mitigation. Cutting train lengths alongside was not smart. Southeastern had to change things within weeks as they misjudged passenger numbers.
Anyway, fast forward and those “temporary” cuts in capacity and frequency introduced in August 2016 look set to remain after the multi-billion pound scheme completes in 2018.
Click here to see Southeastern’s planned timetable from January 2018. That is when trains from Cannon Street will once again be able to stop at London Bridge. I expected services to at least revert to how they were before 2016. But there’s still only around eight trains leaving London terminals shown in the future timetable. And not only that, the padding added in to the timetable over this period has been retained. More massaging of stats. Cannon Street to Abbey Wood is two minutes slower.
In reality, I hoped for a slight improvement in journey times given more tracks and platforms were being built which should have reduced congestion.
Increasing the number of tracks and platforms at London Bridge from six to nine was supposed to improve things for Southeastern passengers. It was a major selling point. It was to mean less congestion on approach or departure from London Bridge as Thameslink trains wouldn’t cross Southeastern trains as services would mostly be segregated enabling quicker journeys.
Charing Cross services
More tracks and platforms for Charing Cross services was supposed to do likewise. No evidence of this at all.
It’s hard on my cursory look through to see many who use Southeastern that actually benefits from the scheme. Have a look and maybe I’m wrong.
Fast trains that run up to 2016 also seemed to have disappeared. They’ve cut trains and made the few remaining services stop at every stop. Particularly bad news for those going to Dartford and beyond.
The whole scheme seems to benefit Thameslink passengers in south and north London, which was expected, but offer little to Southeastern users.
The Greenwich line may receive two Thameslink trains an hour but that will be a whole year afterwards. And even then some Southeastern stations may see cuts alongside.
So another year with poor service for these busy stations? Even adding Thameslink brings a net drop on service levels before the scheme commenced. And in areas with masses of housebuilding underway. I’ve covered many new developments around Deptford station.
Maybe planners think Crossrail coming to Abbey Wood and Woolwich means cuts further along the line are fine. Again though, Crossrail opens a whole year after. And peak gaps of near 25 minutes just aren’t acceptable at very busy stations such as Greenwich. It appears to be getting the worst service in decades after the completion of a scheme that was sold as bringing many improvements.Was this always the plan yet kept quiet? Has this come about due to Chris Grayling becoming Transport Secretary and George Osborne cutting the transport budget massively at the 2015 spending review? Many Tory voters are on sticky ground after this if commenting on poor rail services. It adds to a catalogue of improvements now probably shelved due to Tory action such as:
- More all-day staffing at stations to man barriers and improve safety, especially at night.
- Lower fares upon joining the TfL fare scale
- Longer ticket office hours
- Lewisham station and track upgrade work
- Upgrade work at places such as Woolwich Dockyard for 12-car services
- Longer trains and more capacity
- More stabling space for trains
- Integration with house building to provide additional income and better facilities
The timetable is marked as consultative – is there somewhere we can give feedback? I can’t see it.
However, a train every 5-8 minutes at commute times was expected.